Google Blocks 'Climategate'

Update... Google has fixed it.

It appears that Google has blocked 'climategate' or any variation of the phrase from its auto-suggest feature (not from its search engine). The same is true for Youtube and all other google-owned sites I have queried.

It's the first auto-suggest phrase on Yahoo, Bing, Dogpile, WebCrawler, Ask.com, and any other search engine that is not associated with Google.

Free Republic Forum Spreads Propaganda Against Mitt Romney

The so-called conservative political forum FreeRepublic.com inserts anti-Romney propaganda in each of their threads:

"Conservatives beware: The real Mitt Romney arguing FOR abortion, even for underage girls without parental permission

Don't let anyone tell you otherwise, this is the creepy smiling face of an evil baby killing butcher!"

The inserted 'opinions' then provide links to more propaganda inserted by the website, smearing so-called Romneycare. I think it's safe to say the socialized healthcare issue is the weak spot for Romney right now. But considering how much the Massachusetts health care has been misrepresented, how much the liberals had altered it from Romney's vision, this infighting by a so-called Republican forum is despicable.

I have deleted this shameful forum from my news sources.

Associated Press Continues With Honduras "Coup" Lie, NYT Cover Up

The Associated Press falsely calls the impeachment of Zelaya a 'coup' at least 7 times in their report on the Honduras elections. Despite Zelaya's call for a boycott, record numbers of voters turned out for the elections.

Some reports say 70% of the population voted.

The New York Times refuses to report how many people voted, even though they admit "much of the suspense appeared to hang on how many of Honduras’s 4.6 million voters would turn up."

NYT reports that 46% of people voted in the last elections which Zelaya won, yet fail to report that over 60% voted in these elections. NYT insists that despite the 25% increase in voting, the "The coup has divided Honduran society between those who support the restoration of the president, Manuel Zelaya, and those who say the coup was the only recourse against a populist president seeking to remain in power beyond his term." That's easy to say when you cover up the true numbers!

The media has completely ignored violent Zelaya supporters who tried to sabotage the elections.

New York Times Distorts Honduras Situation In Favor Of Dictator

Great analysis over at hotair.

AP Uses Disgraced Climategate Scientist To Pressure U.S. To Reduce Emissions

AP headline: US and China to reduce emissions, but not enough

Yes, the Associated Press frets that the United States isn't reducing their carbon emissions enough to stop global warming. This is the latest AP effort to support cap and trade legislation as they ignore the climategate scandal.

Scientists say the industrial countries must slash carbon emissions by 25 to 40 percent by 2020 below 1990 to prevent the Earth from adding two degrees Centigrade (3.6F), the maximum considered safe.

Who is the scientist that made this important claim? None other than Michael Mann, the disgraced CRU scientist at the center of the scientific scandal of the century, the senior ranking member of the Obama Administration.

Climatechange: The Next Generation reported in 2008:

Mann said he would leave solutions largely to future discussions, but presented the audience with a picture of the painting The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, a portrait of a prophecy from the Christian Bible about the end of the Earth.

"They will make an appearance if we chose to remain on the course we're on," Mann said, pointing to the painting.

During a question and answer session, Mann explained that two degrees Celsius of warming is considered a danger zone because two degrees Celsius higher than the average temperature of the Earth today is the temperature when Greenland had no ice sheet.

KPBS quoted him:

"Just 20 more years of emissions would put us at CO2 levels where there is a danger of warming in excess of about two degrees Celsius, or 3.5 degrees or so Fahrenheit,” says Mann. “And that's often considered a threshold for what we might begin to think of as a potentially dangerous level of interference with the climate."

Of course AP would cover up climategate and continue to scare the public with dire predictions, but it is very audacious for them to base their predictions on the disgraced scientists themselves!!

Related... promised funds from leading countries to fight global warming 'have not materialized', U.S. media completely ignores this news.

LA Times Fabricates Quote To Defend ACORN

LA Times received a black eye when they claimed the Los Angeles ACORN was clean. A video of illegal activity promptly surfaced.

No retraction from the LA Times.

Instead, they went on to defend the corrupt liberal organization by falsely claiming that whistle-blower O'Keefe compared himself to slime ball Michael Moore:

I regret that I didn't get through in September when I tried to obtain O'Keefe's response to Stewart's comments. He said he didn't receive the e-mail I sent via the website that posts his videos. He told me this week via e-mail that Stewart has no legitimate defense for her "outrageous" comments and that release of unedited video would do nothing to make her look better.

So what sort of creature does this make O'Keefe? I don't disagree with his observation in a previous interview with The Times that he follows the mold of filmmaker Michael Moore, using confrontation to get at his version of the truth.

O'Keefe never said that. The LA Times reporter Rainy defends this libel by claiming that O'Keefe's comments were unpublished.

Related... California Attorney General Jerry Brown defends ACORN obstruction of justice. Typical.

CBC Reporter Pwnd On Climategate

Obama's Role In Climategate

The first mention of Barack Obama came from a liberal defender of the faith here (skip to 4:28):


"I'm sorry, Michael Mann is at this point President Obama's point person as I understand it on climate change. He has rebutted the allegations, saying... there were some areas where they should not share their data, that they should not necessarily share data.'...

He's a senior ranking member of the Obama Administration."

Canada Free Press has traced the scandal to Obama's Science Czar John Holdren. Many emails have surfaced between Michael Mann and John Holdren.

When a scientist asks Holdren if he is worried that the burden of proof rests to heavily on a single scientist (Michael Mann), Holdren replies: "But, in practice, burden of proof is an evolving thing-it evolves as the amount of evidence relevant to a particular proposition grows."

I guess truth is a 'living document.'

More Here
Related... Scandal Spreads To New Zealand

Worst Media Excuses For Climategate- BBC Received Emails 6 Weeks Ago!

Update... BBC says they received the leaked files 6 weeks ago. Naturally they refused to report it then.

Telegraph finds only the best media spins:

Flat out denial (www.realclimate.org)- "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords."

It was a typing error (CRU director Phil Jones)- "The use of the term ‘hiding the decline’ was in an email written in haste" (this guy gave many more ridiculous excuses).

Hypocritically refuse to report leaked documents (New York Times)- "The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted here."

This is only an issue of data protection (BBC- "But this affair will surely change things: From now, scientific teams and peer-review groups will be much more cautious about how they word e-mails.

Researchers at CRU complain that no one will want to do collaborative work if their private e-mail conversations may later be revealed. But many commercial corporate organisations at risk of hacking have developed ways of communicating that don’t leave them open to sabotage."

Read entire story here

They miss quite a few biased stories, like from Associated Press or Washington Post, but these are some nice catches.

United Nations Bans Non-Liberal Media From Climate Change Summit

World Net Daily is threatening to sue the United Nations for refusing to give them credentials to attend the climate change summit. Only fawning upbeat liberals like the BBC are allowed.

Media: People Aren't Qualified To Understand Global Warming

Skip ahead to 4:20- Fox News reports on Sen. Inhofe's call for an investigation before this explosion from a radical liberal elitist.


More video of liberal meltdown here

That's right, you and I aren't qualified to criticize scientific cover-ups and manipulations because we aren't educated. CNBC ambushed Inhofe earlier today, refusing to let him speak for himself, as they further insisted that he isn't smart enough to talk about global warming. CNBC insists that scientists so closely linked to Obama couldn't possibly be crooked! Oops.

The media has largely ignored Climategate, which I was among the first to report on, but they have gone on to illogically appeal to authority (as they did here), refuse to report the actual text of the files (NYT), irrelevant conclusions (Associated Press), and the typical claim that there is no scandal revealed. CNN says the emails are taken out of context. BBC says the irrelevant criticism is a "trial by internet."

Reuters was happy to trumpet CRU's claim that Climategate is a "smear campaign".

There is nothing in the stolen material which indicates that peer-reviewed publications by CRU, and others, on the nature of global warming and related climate change are not of the highest-quality of scientific investigation and interpretation.